IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rpdpjp/22030.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

[WTO Case Review Series No.40] Turkey – Pharmaceutical Products (EU) (DS583): The first use of the DSU Article 25 appeal arbitration mechanism in the context of the dysfunction of the WTO Appellate Body (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • HIRAMI Kenta

Abstract

This case is the first case in which the DSU Article 25 arbitration was used as an ad hoc alternative appeal mechanism against the backdrop of the dysfunction of the WTO Appellate Body since the end of 2019. This arbitration procedure is very similar to the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), which is expected to be utilized soon, and in that sense, it may serve as a touchstone for the future operation of the MPIA. The question is whether this appeal arbitration mechanism is a mere replication of the Appellate Body procedure or a new appeal mechanism that fixes the problems of the Appellate Body. As far as this case is concerned, its arbitral award appears to be generally restrained, and one gets the impression that this appeal mechanism is not a mere replication of the Appellate Body procedure. Nevertheless, it is too early to predict the course of the alternative appeal arbitration mechanism from this award alone, and since, in such a new dispute settlement mechanism, early practices will largely determine the working paradigm and legal culture to be followed thereafter, the future of the appeal arbitration mechanism under the DSU Article 25 will depend on how faithfully arbitrators and parties to a dispute use that mechanism in initial cases.

Suggested Citation

  • HIRAMI Kenta, 2022. "[WTO Case Review Series No.40] Turkey – Pharmaceutical Products (EU) (DS583): The first use of the DSU Article 25 appeal arbitration mechanism in the context of the dysfunction of the WTO Appellate ," Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) 22030, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:22030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/pdp/22p030.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:22030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.