IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rpdpjp/22016.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Industrial Policy Reconsidered Based on Recent Debates (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • AMBASHI Masahito

Abstract

This paper attempts to reconsider recent debates on industrial policy from the academic perspective while maintaining awareness of practical perspectives. Not only have the roles of industrial policy been reevaluated in many countries since the 2008 global financial crisis, but the scope of governments has been expanded with the development of industrial policy. First, this paper shows that the expectation toward industrial policy has also increased in academia based on this background and that the academic definition of industrial policy has expanded to include a wide range of measures that address social and economic challenges, while its role is basically limited to the modification of market failures. Second, after reviewing traditional, theoretical rationales and critiques for industrial policy presented in economics, this paper surveys economic empirical research based on recent “evidence-based policy making (EBPM),†focusing on Japanese industrial policy cases. Third, this paper highlights authors who advocate “new industrial policy†and elaborates on the “mission-oriented approach†to industrial policy that emphasizes the importance of creating and shaping markets beyond the mere modification of market failures. Finally, this paper discusses challenges and future perspectives surrounding academic debates on industrial policy, considering the real implementation in countries including Japan.

Suggested Citation

  • AMBASHI Masahito, 2022. "Industrial Policy Reconsidered Based on Recent Debates (Japanese)," Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) 22016, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:22016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/pdp/22p016.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:22016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.