[WTO Case Review Series No.20] United States—Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products (DS381/RW): The notion of "calibration" and legitimate regulatory distinctions under Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement (Japanese)
This paper examines US-Tuna II , one of the disputes called a trilogy of the cases (along with US-Clove Cigarettes and US-COOL ) under the Word Trade Organization (WTO)'s Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (hereinafter "TBT Agreement"). This case was Article 21.5 (compliance) proceeding under the WTO's Dispute Settlement Understanding, addressing a question whether the United States was compliant with the findings made in the original proceeding. A major issue in this proceeding was whether the regulatory distinctions under the U.S. labelling scheme were "calibrated" to the differences in risks to dolphins among different fisheries under Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement. This paper analyzes the treatment of the "calibration" notion under this proceeding. However, the compliance panel did not properly apply this "calibration" notion, thus, the dispute was not settled under this proceeding. Currently, the second Article 21.5 proceeding is ongoing.
|Date of creation:||Aug 2017|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 11th floor, Annex, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) 1-3-1, Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-8901|
Web page: http://www.rieti.go.jp/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:17024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (KUMAGAI, Akiko)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.