IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Survey on Management Score and Quality Adjustment in Medical and Nursing Services (Japanese)


  • INUI Tomohiko
  • ITO Yukiko
  • MIYAGAWA Tsutomu
  • SATO Kina


Medical and nursing services are one of the "non-market" type services: the majority of production costs are publicly funded and their administrations are regulated. In non-market industries, providers are often entitled with tax benefits and subsidies, which may result in loose management under soft (i.e., not tight) budgets. Thus, it is essential to measure and monitor the management of the medical and nursing services. The management score established by Bloom and Van Reenen (2007) measures process management, target management, and human resource management through face-to-face interviews. Integrating this non-financial information across industries and countries, they have established a common standard of management score, which has recently been applied to the healthcare sector. While a wide range of organizational structures are allowed in Japan, the price of each medical or nursing service is set by law. Therefore, the quality of each service should not vary. On the other hand, past research has observed significant differences in quality and productivities. This paper attempts to clarify the effect of the managerial difference on these observed service differences. We also propose a standardized face-to-face questionnaire format based on Bloom and Van Reenen (2007) to help further research on managerial practices in the healthcare sector.

Suggested Citation

  • INUI Tomohiko & ITO Yukiko & MIYAGAWA Tsutomu & SATO Kina, 2017. "Survey on Management Score and Quality Adjustment in Medical and Nursing Services (Japanese)," Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) 17022, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:17022

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:17022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (MATSUKURA, Taeko). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.