IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

New Horizons and an Introduction to Intellectual Property Systems: Perspectives on reviewing intellectual property systems for the future (Japanese)

Listed author(s):
  • KIYOKAWA Yutaka
Registered author(s):

    A so-called pro-patent policy has been globally adopted by an increasing number of countries since the 1980s and its use is spreading in Japan as well. However, the United States and European countries, who were the pioneers of the policy, have begun to reconsider it. Meanwhile, the paradigm of the era has changed dramatically with the sophistication of technology and networks such as Web2.0 and the development of open innovation. In this environment, should the pro-patent approach be regarded as the sole policy to be relied on in the same way as before? Should the policy be reviewed? If so, from what kind of perspective should it be reviewed? Contrary to the existing approach of apparently protecting every right for the sake of the word "pro-patent," this paper will examine the principle of intellectual property systems and look at the justification for their exclusiveness in an effort to identify areas for review. In doing so, we will add public (ethics and competition policies) and effective social system perspectives. In particular, in light of the paradigm changes described above, the purpose of the intellectual property systems-the purpose, at least, for Japan at present-is to encourage innovation. Therefore, this paper will focus on the viewpoint of market transactions based on the development of open innovation. (To state the conclusion in advance, this viewpoint will also raise new considerations about the justification of the exclusiveness.) This paper also presents several proposals for the revision of the patent system as specific examples of the proposed areas for revision. Meanwhile, any revision first requires an understanding of the current situation. In particular, because a large volume of analysis has been required for the former digital IT equipment industry in terms of the role of the patent system (although patents have a strong relationship with the digital IT equipment industry, the status of the Japanese digital IT equipment industry has unfortunately been deteriorating since the 1990s, primarily because developing countries have caught up in technological terms), the details are explained in the supplement at the end of the paper. (The conclusion about the importance of the patent system has not changed.)

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Policy Discussion Papers (Japanese) with number 08009.

    in new window

    Length: 94 pages
    Date of creation: Sep 2008
    Handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:08009
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    11th floor, Annex, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) 1-3-1, Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-8901

    Phone: +81-3-3501-1363
    Fax: +81-3-3501-8577
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rpdpjp:08009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (KUMAGAI, Akiko)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.