IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rdpsjp/23015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why is China Building a New System for Mobilizing Resources Nationwide for Scientific and Technological Innovation? A comparative study of the Chinese system and the EU system of scientific and technological innovation (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • MENG Jianjun
  • PAN Motao

Abstract

In recent years, the government of China (GOC) has carried out the institutional design of scientific and technological innovation in line with the concept of a new system for mobilizing resources nationwide. From the perspective of a comparative analysis of the scientific and technological innovation system of the European Union–"open strategic autonomy"—this paper aims to explain the inevitability and rationality of the GOC's choice of a new system aimed at the nationwide mobilization of resources and form a more objective understanding of the deep logic behind the system design. Officially defined as a new system for mobilizing resources nationwide by GOC, it is “a new system that systematically concentrates national power and resources within key national undertakings†. The practical attribute of solving problems is far higher than the political attribute of surpassing strategy in science and technology. In contrast, the EU's “open strategic autonomy†is the current development strategy which is the product of risk active response in the era of Sino-US competition and cooperation. The specific scientific and technological innovation policies are subject to this strategic system and emphasize the dependence on the openness of internal countries to maintain independence in Sino-US competition and cooperation. From the perspective of system design, this paper compares China's new system for mobilizing resources nationwide and the EU's "open strategic autonomy". Through the comparison of the background, organizational form, talent, and capital allocation of China and the EU systems, we will briefly evaluate the effects and point out any problems that the two systems contain.

Suggested Citation

  • MENG Jianjun & PAN Motao, 2023. "Why is China Building a New System for Mobilizing Resources Nationwide for Scientific and Technological Innovation? A comparative study of the Chinese system and the EU system of scientific and techno," Discussion Papers (Japanese) 23015, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:23015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/23j015.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:23015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.