Development of the "Right to Work" Theory: Focusing on discussions on the Anglo-American labor law (Japanese)
In the 1980s, the problems of structural unemployment and high unemployment among the youth intensified in the United States and the United Kingdom. As countermeasures to those problems, a series of new policies—such as the "flexibilization" of the labor market, relaxation of the labor law and regulation, active labor market policies (ALMP), and workfare policies—were introduced. In the process, a great deal of discussion occurred among academics and practitioners of the Anglo-American academic labor law as to how to regulate the labor market, thereby developing new branches of the labor law theory. The right to work theory is one of them. Discussions in the United States and the United Kingdom have been particularly substantive because laws in both countries have no explicit provisions for the constitutional right to work. A theory for the procedural review of the right to work, which uses the acceptance of "decent work" (or "dignified work") for all as a guiding norm, underlines the importance of employment policy decisions based on thoughtful consideration and deliberation among parties concerned as well as of the process of identifying and examining problems that may result from the institutionalization of such policy (reflexive law approach). Meanwhile, with regard to the compulsive aspect of the workfare policy, it points to the need to reaffirm the importance of the freedom to work, an aspect that constitutes the normative content of the right to work, from the viewpoint of guaranteeing such right as defined broadly and not limited to the guarantee of basic income. Furthermore, in order to prevent the workfare policy from forcing people to accept indecent work conditions and become working poor, it is argued that the right to work should be defined as the right to choose (decent, suitable and "rewarding" work), whereby workers should be able to refuse—without losing unemployment benefits—a job that would not help them to develop their career, improve future job prospects, or enhance their skills and ability. Today, the Japanese labor market has the same problems as those in the United States and the United Kingdom. The development of arguments on the right to work theory in the two countries indicates the necessity of redefining the significance of "work" and having a normative discussion on the issue.
|Date of creation:||May 2013|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 11th floor, Annex, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) 1-3-1, Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-8901|
Web page: http://www.rieti.go.jp/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:13029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (NUKATANI Sorahiko)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.