IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rdpsjp/13029.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Development of the "Right to Work" Theory: Focusing on discussions on the Anglo-American labor law (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • ARITA Kenji

Abstract

In the 1980s, the problems of structural unemployment and high unemployment among the youth intensified in the United States and the United Kingdom. As countermeasures to those problems, a series of new policies—such as the "flexibilization" of the labor market, relaxation of the labor law and regulation, active labor market policies (ALMP), and workfare policies—were introduced. In the process, a great deal of discussion occurred among academics and practitioners of the Anglo-American academic labor law as to how to regulate the labor market, thereby developing new branches of the labor law theory. The right to work theory is one of them. Discussions in the United States and the United Kingdom have been particularly substantive because laws in both countries have no explicit provisions for the constitutional right to work. A theory for the procedural review of the right to work, which uses the acceptance of "decent work" (or "dignified work") for all as a guiding norm, underlines the importance of employment policy decisions based on thoughtful consideration and deliberation among parties concerned as well as of the process of identifying and examining problems that may result from the institutionalization of such policy (reflexive law approach). Meanwhile, with regard to the compulsive aspect of the workfare policy, it points to the need to reaffirm the importance of the freedom to work, an aspect that constitutes the normative content of the right to work, from the viewpoint of guaranteeing such right as defined broadly and not limited to the guarantee of basic income. Furthermore, in order to prevent the workfare policy from forcing people to accept indecent work conditions and become working poor, it is argued that the right to work should be defined as the right to choose (decent, suitable and "rewarding" work), whereby workers should be able to refuse—without losing unemployment benefits—a job that would not help them to develop their career, improve future job prospects, or enhance their skills and ability. Today, the Japanese labor market has the same problems as those in the United States and the United Kingdom. The development of arguments on the right to work theory in the two countries indicates the necessity of redefining the significance of "work" and having a normative discussion on the issue.

Suggested Citation

  • ARITA Kenji, 2013. "Development of the "Right to Work" Theory: Focusing on discussions on the Anglo-American labor law (Japanese)," Discussion Papers (Japanese) 13029, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:13029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/13j029.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Castro, Lucio & Olarreaga, Marcelo & Saslavsky, Daniel, 2006. "The impact of trade with China and India on Argentina’s manufacturing employment," MPRA Paper 538, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Auer, Raphael & Fischer, Andreas M., 2010. "The effect of low-wage import competition on U.S. inflationary pressure," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, pages 491-503.
    3. Joachim Wagner, 2007. "Exports and Productivity: A Survey of the Evidence from Firm-level Data," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, pages 60-82.
    4. Bernard, Andrew B. & Jensen, J. Bradford & Schott, Peter K., 2006. "Survival of the best fit: Exposure to low-wage countries and the (uneven) growth of U.S. manufacturing plants," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, pages 219-237.
    5. Álvarez, Roberto & Claro, Sebastián, 2009. "David Versus Goliath: The Impact of Chinese Competition on Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 560-571, March.
    6. Tomiura, Eiichi, 2003. "The impact of import competition on Japanese manufacturing employment," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 118-133, June.
    7. Maria Guadalupe & Julie M. Wulf, 2008. "The Flattening Firm and Product Market Competition: The Effect of Trade Liberalization," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-067, Harvard Business School.
    8. Greenaway, David & Gullstrand, Joakim & Kneller, Richard, 2008. "Surviving globalisation," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 264-277, March.
    9. Marc J. Melitz, 2003. "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(6), pages 1695-1725, November.
    10. Anna Maria MAYDA & NAKANE Masato & STEINBERG, Chad & YAMADA Hiroyuki, 2012. "Exposure to Low-wage Country Imports and the Growth of Japanese Manufacturing Plants," Discussion papers 12038, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    11. David Greenaway & Richard Kneller, 2007. "Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 117(517), pages 134-161, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:13029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (KUMAGAI, Akiko). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.