Characteristics of Subsidies Granted by China and Practical Challenges: Referring to the U.S.-China dispute (Japanese)
The U.S.-China disputes on subsidies granted by China have become a serious matter. For example, the U.S. initiated a series of investigations on countervailing duties and also initiated a Trade Act 1979 Section 301 investigation on subsidies granted by China. Moreover, several WTO dispute settlement cases involving subsidies granted by China have been already initiated. First, this paper focuses on Chinese industrial policies in general and introduces their historical background, policy makers, and the characteristics of their policy tools. Through analyzing the disputes mentioned above, it also clarifies the characteristics of subsidies granted by China and points out what types of legal issues arise from the viewpoint of WTO law, especially the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. Finally, based on the findings above, it examines what types of challenges confront Japan at present and breaks them down into the following four practical aspects: How Japan should take advantage of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism; how Japan should amend its domestic legal system regarding countervailing measures; how the WTO law should be amended; and how Japan should design both a Japan-China economic partnership agreement (EPA) and a bilateral investment agreement (BIA) in the future.
|Date of creation:||Jun 2011|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 11th floor, Annex, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) 1-3-1, Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-8901|
Web page: http://www.rieti.go.jp/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:11067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (NUKATANI Sorahiko)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.