IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Business Unit Governance in Japan: Focusing on corporate boundaries and two-layer agency relationships (Japanese)

Listed author(s):
  • AOKI Hideaki
  • MIYAJIMA Hideaki
Registered author(s):

    With the diversification and globalization of Japanese companies in recent years, their business portfolios have become more complex, and the grouping of companies has progressed via carve-outs and M&As. As a result, adequate control of business units by headquarters (business unit governance) has grown in importance. Meanwhile, as organizational structures have become more decentralized, companies have to face two-tier agency relationships in corporate governance—the traditional agency relationship between shareholders and managers and the increasing number of agency relationships between headquarters' managers and divisional managers or between a parent company and its subsidiaries. In this paper, we analyze the current practice of business governance, from the viewpoints of authority delegation and monitoring of business units. We use a survey on corporate diversification and the governance conducted by RIETI in April 2007, targeting the firms listed on the First Section of the Tokyo Stock Exchange (excluding financial and insurance companies). Through our analysis, we found that more authority was delegated to the wholly owned subsidiaries than to the in-house business units. Furthermore, we show that there was significant complementarity between the delegation of authority and monitoring of in-house business units, while that between the delegation of authority and wholly owned subsidiaries was not found. With respect to two-tier agency relationships, we illustrate that companies under stronger pressure from the capital market or those more actively reforming their board of directors are likely to monitor their business units more strictly.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) in its series Discussion Papers (Japanese) with number 10057.

    in new window

    Length: 58 pages
    Date of creation: Dec 2010
    Handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:10057
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    11th floor, Annex, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) 1-3-1, Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-8901

    Phone: +81-3-3501-1363
    Fax: +81-3-3501-8577
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:10057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (NUKATANI Sorahiko)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.