IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dissemination of Regenerative Medicine - A comparison of the regulatory systems between Japan and Korea - (Japanese)


  • KURATA Kenji
  • Youn-Hee CHOI


Although Japan has surpassed Korea in terms of R&D activities in the area of regenerative medicine, Korea has been more successful in its commercialization. As one of the key reasons for this, the 'posture' of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) in Japan is often criticized. Rather than dwelling on the abstract, this paper chooses to focus on the set up and operation of actual systems that take into consideration the promotion of regenerative medicine in Japan. Analysis and case studies of the regulatory systems in Japan and Korea show a clear difference between the two countries, although their systems are basically the same. There are two pathways for applying unapproved medicine in clinical research, including regenerative medicine, to human subjects in Japan, whereas there is only one pathway in Korea. The Korean Food & Drug Administration (KFDA) is the only authority through which approval can be gained in Korea. In comparison, Japan has one additional pathway besides approval through the PMDA if the clinical research is conducted within the framework of the Doctor's Affairs Law. We assume that the coexistence of the two pathways in Japan causes inefficiency in promoting the industrialization of regenerative medicine products. Therefore, it is advisable to combine the two pathways into one under PMDA authority, in order to disseminate regenerative medicine in Japan.

Suggested Citation

  • KURATA Kenji & Youn-Hee CHOI, 2010. "Dissemination of Regenerative Medicine - A comparison of the regulatory systems between Japan and Korea - (Japanese)," Discussion Papers (Japanese) 10039, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:10039

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:10039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (KUMAGAI, Akiko). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.