The Software Industry's Multilayered Subcontracting Structure: Empirical analysis of innovation and productivity (Japanese)
In this paper we analyze the productivity of the Japanese software industry, using matching data from the Basic Survey of Japanese Business Structure and Activities, and the Survey of Selected Service Industries. Using data concerning the receipt and issuance of orders between software companies, we categorize each of them as one of four types, namely "independent," "prime contractor," "intermediate contractor," and "final contractor," and then compare total factor productivity. The result shows that the productivity of "independent" software companies is higher than that of the other types, namely the companies that make up the multilayered software industry, starting from prime contractors to intermediate contractors and then to final contractors. In addition, we analyze how innovation activities, as seen in patents and R&D, and factors concerning the quality of personnel, such as ratios of software engineers and programmers to total employees, impact productivity. As a result, we find that innovation activities are important as decisive factors for productivity, especially in prime contractor companies, as is the quality of personnel in independent companies.
|Date of creation:||Jan 2009|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.rieti.go.jp/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:09002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (NUKATANI Sorahiko)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.