IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/rdpsjp/08060.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fairness Today: From the perspective of organizational justice (Japanese)

Author

Listed:
  • MORISHIMA Motohiro

Abstract

In large numbers of firms and organizations today there is a major shift away from an equality principle (quasi equality principle) that seeks to ensure fairness by keeping disparities in resource allocations low, and towards a principle of equity approach where resources are allocated (i.e. remuneration is paid) in accordance with the degree of contribution to the organization or firm. However, in reality, securing fairness under the principle of equity has caused numerous difficulties and there has been a great deal of discussion on how to retrospectively address the unfairness of the principle of equity. Amid this, within firms a complementary philosophy of "procedural justice" is being adopted, and in many cases relief is being provided when company employees or members of organizations perceive resource allocation to be inequitable. Premised on the fact that it is difficult to establish the fairness of the results of allocation in accordance with the principle of equity, fairness is established in the following way. The persons (workers) receiving allocations participate partially in the process of determining allocations and engage in any subsequent dispute resolution. In this paper I first explain the difficulty of the shift from the quasi equality principle to the principle of equity, and explain the philosophy of "procedural justice," which complements partially the problem areas in the principle of equity. In addition, I analyze questionnaire-based surveys conducted in 2004 and 2005 in combination with corporate performance data, showing that procedural justice measures may have contributed not only to gaining the compliance of workers, but also to corporate performance. In particular, this suggests that the introduction of mechanisms to ensure the fairness of company-level procedures, such as permanent bodies for labor-management discussion and structures for working people to declare their grievances, is important in relation to corporate business performance.

Suggested Citation

  • MORISHIMA Motohiro, 2008. "Fairness Today: From the perspective of organizational justice (Japanese)," Discussion Papers (Japanese) 08060, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:08060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/08j060.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:rdpsjp:08060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.