IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/19076.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Generating a Reform of the BRI from the Inside: Japan's Contribution Via Soft Law Diplomacy

Author

Listed:
  • Alisher UMIRDINOV

Abstract

This paper investigates whether there is space for Japan to maneuver soft law mechanisms regarding China to ensure conformance of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects to high-level standards. The author posits that with its unique geographic position, sharp rivalry in ASEAN, and strongly intertwined and complementary market with China, Japan's potential to reform the BRI from the inside should not be underestimated. Rather, by stubbornly adhering to high-level "Quality Infrastructure Investment" (QII) principles promoted by the G7 countries in the last three years, Japan has successfully pulled China toward these principles, enabling it to endorse the notion of high-quality infrastructure in the second BRI forum. Under Japanese presidency, the G20 Osaka summit also vastly contributed to upgrading the level and normative content of the QII principles. Moreover, despite its soft law and less-institutional nature, effective utilization of the Japan-China Memorandum on Business Cooperation in Third Countries can provide Japan with some new tactics that can restrain harmful economic activities of Chinese companies in its markets. At this point, the Sino-Japanese collaboration in Thailand's East-West Economic Corridor Program will test whether the Chinese government is sincerely marketing "Third Party Market Cooperation" or if it is just another futile attempt.

Suggested Citation

  • Alisher UMIRDINOV, 2019. "Generating a Reform of the BRI from the Inside: Japan's Contribution Via Soft Law Diplomacy," Discussion papers 19076, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
  • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:19076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/19e076.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:19076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.