IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ete/kbiper/588680.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Understanding recommendation quality using embeddings

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Reusens
  • Tom Haegemans
  • Wilfried Lemahieu
  • Monique Snoeck
  • Bart Baesens
  • Luc Sels

Abstract

Current methods of evaluating the quality of recommender systems are based on averages of metrics such as the average normalized discounted cumulative gain, average diversity and average reciprocity. Averages of metrics give a good sense of the overall quality of the recommendations, but not of how their quality is distributed with respect to the recommendation system’s users or items. This paper presents a visual method, based on embedding a high dimensional content feature-space into a 2D image, that is capable of providing insights in which users are receiving high quality recommendations and how biased recommendation quality is with respect to different types of users. Through a proof of concept in the domain of job recommendation we show that our method allows business people to come to relevant answers to the question “For which of my users does my recommender system work well/poorly?”.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Reusens & Tom Haegemans & Wilfried Lemahieu & Monique Snoeck & Bart Baesens & Luc Sels, 2017. "Understanding recommendation quality using embeddings," Working Papers of Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management, Leuven 588680, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Decision Sciences and Information Management, Leuven.
  • Handle: RePEc:ete:kbiper:588680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/462591
    File Function: Understanding recommendation quality using embeddings
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:kbiper:588680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: library EBIB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://feb.kuleuven.be/KBI .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.