IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/esy/uefcwp/37486.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Predictive Quantile Regressions with Persistent and Heteroskedastic Predictors: A Powerful 2SLS Testing Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Demetrescu, Matei
  • Rodrigues, Paulo MM
  • Taylor, AM Robert

Abstract

We develop new tests for predictability, based on the Lagrange Multiplier [LM] principle, in the context of quantile regression [QR] models which allow for persistent and endogenous predictors driven by conditionally and/or unconditionally heteroskedastic errors. Of the extant predictive QR tests in the literature, only the moving blocks bootstrap implementation, due to Fan and Lee (2019), of theWald-type test of Lee (2016) can allow for conditionally heteroskedastic errors in the context of a QR model with persistent predictors. In common with all other tests in the literature it cannot, however, allow for any form of unconditionally heteroskedastic behaviour in the errors. The LM-based approach we adopt in this paper is obtained from a simple auxiliary linear test regression which facilitates inference based on established instrumental variable methods. We demonstrate that, as a result, the tests we develop, based on either conventional or heteroskedasticity-consistent standard errors in the auxiliary regression, are robust under the null hypothesis of no predictability to conditional heteroskedasticity and to unconditional heteroskedasticity in the errors driving the predictors, with no need for bootstrap implementation. Tests are developed both for predictability at a single quantile, and also jointly over a set of quantiles. Simulation results highlight the superior finite sample size and power properties of our proposed LM tests over the tests of Lee (2016) and Fan and Lee (2019) for both conditionally and unconditionally heteroskedastic errors. An empirical application to the equity premium for the S&P 500 highlights the practical usefulness of our proposed tests, uncovering significant evidence of predictability in the left and right tails of the returns distribution for a number of predictors containing information on market or firm risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Demetrescu, Matei & Rodrigues, Paulo MM & Taylor, AM Robert, 2025. "Predictive Quantile Regressions with Persistent and Heteroskedastic Predictors: A Powerful 2SLS Testing Approach," Essex Finance Centre Working Papers 37486, University of Essex, Essex Business School.
  • Handle: RePEc:esy:uefcwp:37486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repository.essex.ac.uk/37486/
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ivo Welch & Amit Goyal, 2008. "A Comprehensive Look at The Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 21(4), pages 1455-1508, July.
    2. Graham Elliott & Ulrich K. Müller & Mark W. Watson, 2015. "Nearly Optimal Tests When a Nuisance Parameter Is Present Under the Null Hypothesis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83, pages 771-811, March.
    3. Boswijk, H. Peter & Cavaliere, Giuseppe & Rahbek, Anders & Taylor, A.M. Robert, 2016. "Inference on co-integration parameters in heteroskedastic vector autoregressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 64-85.
    4. Komunjer, Ivana, 2005. "Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation for conditional quantiles," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 137-164, September.
    5. Tim Bollerslev & George Tauchen & Hao Zhou, 2009. "Expected Stock Returns and Variance Risk Premia," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(11), pages 4463-4492, November.
    6. Demetrescu, Matei & Georgiev, Iliyan & Rodrigues, Paulo M.M. & Taylor, A.M. Robert, 2022. "Testing for episodic predictability in stock returns," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 85-113.
    7. Ke-Li Xu & Lauren Cohen, 2020. "Testing for Multiple-Horizon Predictability: Direct Regression Based versus Implication Based," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(9), pages 4403-4443.
    8. Bryan Kelly & Hao Jiang, 2014. "Editor's Choice Tail Risk and Asset Prices," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(10), pages 2841-2871.
    9. Campbell, John Y. & Yogo, Motohiro, 2006. "Efficient tests of stock return predictability," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 27-60, July.
    10. Giuseppe Cavaliere & A. M. Robert Taylor, 2008. "Time‐Transformed Unit Root Tests for Models with Non‐Stationary Volatility," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 300-330, March.
    11. repec:bla:jfinan:v:44:y:1989:i:5:p:1115-53 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Michael Jansson & Marcelo J. Moreira, 2006. "Optimal Inference in Regression Models with Nearly Integrated Regressors," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 681-714, May.
    13. Stambaugh, Robert F., 1999. "Predictive regressions," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 375-421, December.
    14. Amit Goyal & Ivo Welch, 2003. "Predicting the Equity Premium with Dividend Ratios," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 639-654, May.
    15. Loukia Meligkotsidou & Ekaterini Panopoulou & Ioannis D. Vrontos & Spyridon D. Vrontos, 2014. "A Quantile Regression Approach to Equity Premium Prediction," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(7), pages 558-576, November.
    16. Lee, Ji Hyung, 2016. "Predictive quantile regression with persistent covariates: IVX-QR approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 105-118.
    17. Chevapatrakul, Thanaset & Xu, Zhongxiang & Yao, Kai, 2019. "The impact of tail risk on stock market returns: The role of market sentiment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 289-301.
    18. Sermin Gungor & Richard Luger, 2021. "Exact Inference in Long-Horizon Predictive Quantile Regressions with an Application to Stock Returns," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 746-788.
    19. Saburo Ohno & Tomohiro Ando, 2018. "Stock return predictability: A factor-augmented predictive regression system with shrinkage method," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 29-60, January.
    20. Maynard, Alex & Shimotsu, Katsumi, 2009. "Covariance-Based Orthogonality Tests For Regressors With Unknown Persistence," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 63-116, February.
    21. Cavanagh, Christopher L. & Elliott, Graham & Stock, James H., 1995. "Inference in Models with Nearly Integrated Regressors," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(5), pages 1131-1147, October.
    22. Loukia Meligkotsidou & Ekaterini Panopoulou & Ioannis D. Vrontos & Spyridon D. Vrontos, 2021. "Out-of-sample equity premium prediction: a complete subset quantile regression approach," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1-2), pages 110-135, January.
    23. Demetrescu, Matei & Rodrigues, Paulo M.M. & Taylor, A.M. Robert, 2023. "Transformed regression-based long-horizon predictability tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    24. Nicolau, João & Rodrigues, Paulo M.M. & Stoykov, Marian Z., 2023. "Tail index estimation in the presence of covariates: Stock returns’ tail risk dynamics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 2266-2284.
    25. Xiaohui Liu & Wei Long & Liang Peng & Bingduo Yang, 2024. "A Unified Inference for Predictive Quantile Regression," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 119(546), pages 1526-1540, April.
    26. Kostakis, Alexandros & Magdalinos, Tassos & Stamatogiannis, Michalis P., 2023. "Taking stock of long-horizon predictability tests: Are factor returns predictable?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    27. Demetrescu, Matei & Georgiev, Iliyan & Rodrigues, Paulo M.M. & Taylor, A.M. Robert, 2023. "Extensions to IVX methods of inference for return predictability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    28. Maynard, Alex & Shimotsu, Katsumi & Kuriyama, Nina, 2024. "Inference in predictive quantile regressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 245(1).
    29. Paye, Bradley S. & Timmermann, Allan, 2006. "Instability of return prediction models," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 274-315, June.
    30. Breitung, Jörg & Demetrescu, Matei, 2015. "Instrumental variable and variable addition based inference in predictive regressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 358-375.
    31. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    32. Portnoy, Stephen, 1991. "Asymptotic behavior of regression quantiles in non-stationary, dependent cases," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 100-113, July.
    33. Nelson, Charles R & Kim, Myung J, 1993. "Predictable Stock Returns: The Role of Small Sample Bias," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 48(2), pages 641-661, June.
    34. Cai, Zongwu & Chen, Haiqiang & Liao, Xiaosai, 2023. "A new robust inference for predictive quantile regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 227-250.
    35. Alexandros Kostakis & Tassos Magdalinos & Michalis P. Stamatogiannis, 2015. "Robust Econometric Inference for Stock Return Predictability," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 28(5), pages 1506-1553.
    36. Bollerslev, Tim & Todorov, Viktor, 2014. "Time-varying jump tails," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 168-180.
    37. José Luis Montiel Olea & Mikkel Plagborg‐Møller, 2019. "Simultaneous confidence bands: Theory, implementation, and an application to SVARs," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 1-17, January.
    38. Fan, Rui & Lee, Ji Hyung, 2019. "Predictive quantile regressions under persistence and conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 261-280.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Demetrescu, Matei & Rodrigues, Paulo M.M. & Taylor, A.M. Robert, 2023. "Transformed regression-based long-horizon predictability tests," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    2. Maynard, Alex & Shimotsu, Katsumi & Kuriyama, Nina, 2024. "Inference in predictive quantile regressions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 245(1).
    3. Demetrescu, Matei & Georgiev, Iliyan & Rodrigues, Paulo M.M. & Taylor, A.M. Robert, 2023. "Extensions to IVX methods of inference for return predictability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    4. Demetrescu, Matei & Georgiev, Iliyan & Rodrigues, Paulo M.M. & Taylor, A.M. Robert, 2022. "Testing for episodic predictability in stock returns," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 85-113.
    5. Demetrescu, Matei & Rodrigues, Paulo M.M., 2022. "Residual-augmented IVX predictive regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 429-460.
    6. Yannick Hoga, 2024. "Persistence-Robust Break Detection in Predictive Quantile and CoVaR Regressions," Papers 2410.05861, arXiv.org.
    7. Tu, Yundong & Xie, Xinling, 2023. "Penetrating sporadic return predictability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(1).
    8. Gonzalo, Jesús & Pitarakis, Jean-Yves, 2019. "Predictive Regressions," UC3M Working papers. Economics 28554, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    9. Georgiev, Iliyan & Harvey, David I. & Leybourne, Stephen J. & Taylor, A.M. Robert, 2018. "Testing for parameter instability in predictive regression models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 101-118.
    10. Zhan Gao & Ji Hyung Lee & Ziwei Mei & Zhentao Shi, 2024. "Econometric Inference for High Dimensional Predictive Regressions," Papers 2409.10030, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    11. Christis Katsouris, 2023. "Predictability Tests Robust against Parameter Instability," Papers 2307.15151, arXiv.org.
    12. Yijie Fei, 2024. "A joint test of predictability and structural break in predictive regressions," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 985-1013, September.
    13. Demetrescu, Matei & Roling, Christoph, 2025. "Testing the Predictive Ability of Possibly Persistent Variables under Asymmetric Loss," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 80-104.
    14. Chiquoine, Benjamin & Hjalmarsson, Erik, 2009. "Jackknifing stock return predictions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 793-803, December.
    15. Kostakis, Alexandros & Magdalinos, Tassos & Stamatogiannis, Michalis P., 2023. "Taking stock of long-horizon predictability tests: Are factor returns predictable?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    16. Lorenzo Camponovo & O. Scaillet & Fabio Trojani, 2013. "Predictability Hidden by Anomalous Observations," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 13-05, Swiss Finance Institute.
    17. Westerlund, Joakim & Narayan, Paresh, 2016. "Testing for predictability in panels of any time series dimension," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 1162-1177.
    18. Christis Katsouris, 2023. "Structural Break Detection in Quantile Predictive Regression Models with Persistent Covariates," Papers 2302.05193, arXiv.org.
    19. Zongwu Cai & Haiqiang Chen & Xiaosai Liao, 2020. "A New Robust Inference for Predictive Quantile Regression," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202002, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Feb 2020.
    20. Andersen, Torben G. & Varneskov, Rasmus T., 2021. "Consistent inference for predictive regressions in persistent economic systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 215-244.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:esy:uefcwp:37486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nikolaos Vlastakis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcessuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.