IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id6954.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stereotypical Occupational Segregation & Gender Inequality: An Experimental Study

Author

Listed:
  • Savita Kulkarni
  • Neeraj Hatekar

Abstract

This paper attempts to distinguish ‘trust in cooperation’ from ‘trust in ability’ with respect to gender through an experimental trust game. ‘Trust in ability’ is explored in the context of hands-on mechanical ability where females are stereotypically believed to be inherently less skillful. Such stereotypes govern, explicitly or implicitly, women’s access to education & employment of certain fields, resulting in gender based occupational segregation of the labour market. This in turn intensifies gender inequality. It is observed higher probability of exhibiting stereotypical behavior among men and women paired with women despite statistically insignificant gender gap in actual performances in the mechanical task assigned. It indicates that ‘trust in ability’ can be governed by such stereotype and affect economic outcomes. It also describes the demotivating psychological process women suffer from, due to endorsement of such stereotypes by the society.

Suggested Citation

  • Savita Kulkarni & Neeraj Hatekar, 2015. "Stereotypical Occupational Segregation & Gender Inequality: An Experimental Study," Working Papers id:6954, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:6954
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=A2015610171626_29.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=6954&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:6954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.