IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id500.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fantasm of Permanence and The Monologic of Empire

Author

Listed:
  • Chowdhury Irad Ahmed Siddiky

    ()

Abstract

In order to understand criminal legislation, one needs to refocus from criminal legislation to its most modern form, the code ─ by turning one's historical attention to the significance of criminal codes, thereby reconnecting the analysis of law to the analysis of the state, jurisprudence to politics. Therefore, particular attention needs to be provided to two analytic distinctions ─ between private and public law, and between criminal and civil law. Modern criminal law scholarship fails to recognize that its subject in large part no longer represents a species of law at all. The category mistake, in other words, transcends that of law and extends to the range of coercive methods available to the modern state. Insofar as criminal law has been transformed into a mode of regulation, it has been transformed into a species of police, rather than of law. Not only the distinction between public and private law remains unclear and unexplored in English Criminal Law scholarship, so does the definition of law and its differentiation from other modes of state coercion. It is no surprise, then, that the greatest successes of English criminal codification would be criminal codes drafted by wise Englishmen (some of whom were experts in criminal law [Stephen], others not [Macaulay]) for various colonies, Canada and India in particular.

Suggested Citation

  • Chowdhury Irad Ahmed Siddiky, 2006. "Fantasm of Permanence and The Monologic of Empire," Working Papers id:500, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:500
    Note: Conference Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=Document12742006480.8906519.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=500&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    criminal law; codification; civil law; coercion; jurisprudence; British colonies; English Criminal Law; MAcaulay; Legal Studies;

    Lists

    This item is featured on the following reading lists or Wikipedia pages:
    1. Chowdhury Irad Ahmed Siddiky in Wikipedia English ne '')

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Padma Prakash). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.