IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id4752.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Transparency in Parliament: A Review of the Procedures and Practices in South Asia along with Recommended Guidelines for Increasing Openness

Author

Listed:
  • South Asians for Human Rights SAHR

Abstract

This paper examines the functioning of Parliaments in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka1 in order to gauge the extent of openness and access from the point of view of both Members of Parliament (MPs) and citizens. The rule books, secondary literature and the websites of Parliament are the chief sources of information. In this paper it is tried to identify the extent of openness in the functioning of Parliaments that is required by their rule books and compared it with what is found in actual practice. Aspects of the working of Parliaments are dealt with under five broad categories. The analysis of openness and access to information in relation to every category of activity is followed up with a set of recommendations containing guidelines which would increase transparency if adopted and fully implemented. [SAHR Reports]. URL:[http://www.southasianrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Tranparency-in-Parliament-Final2.pdf].

Suggested Citation

  • South Asians for Human Rights SAHR, 2012. "Transparency in Parliament: A Review of the Procedures and Practices in South Asia along with Recommended Guidelines for Increasing Openness," Working Papers id:4752, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:4752
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=A2012131125736_20.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=4752&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:4752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.