IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id2670.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The National Commission For Women: Assessing Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Sadhna Arya

Abstract

Although a lot of scholarly attention has gone into issues concerning women for more than three decades, little work has been done on the evolution and functioning of institutions1 that have been created since the mid-1970s to specifically look into the interests of women as discriminated, marginalized and oppressed sections of society. While the Indian State experimented with a variety of forms and modes of organizations and structures on questions relating to women’s equality or women’s status within the broad framework of the welfare state even before the 1970s, the emergence and/or change, modifications, and renewal in these structures and formations from time to time have been influenced by the struggles of women and pressures from women’s movements2 and new and varying approaches to women issues, both at the national and international levels. These new mechanisms were intended to create spaces to influence policies and processes for bringing required changes, both at the ideological and structural levels, to achieve the objectives of gender equality and justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadhna Arya, 2010. "The National Commission For Women: Assessing Performance," Working Papers id:2670, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:2670
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=Document11672010560.3310816.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=2670&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    scholarly attention; women; discriminated; marginalised; opressed sections; organisations; structures; gender equality; justice;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:2670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Padma Prakash). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.