IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Foreign Entry and Domestic Welfare: Can “Market Discipline†be Excessive

Listed author(s):
  • Aditya Bhattacharjea

For most developed countries, "opening up" of the economy has meant the reduction of non-prohibitive tariffs and the easing or abolition of quantitative restrictions. For manydeveloping countries and economies in transition, however, it often requires the relaxation of autarkic policies such as the outright prohibition of imports or foreign investment in particular sectors. The conventional wisdom in economics is that this kind of reform is highly desirable and long overdue. Its virtues are easy to demonstrate in a standard competitive model, and the case becomes even stronger if the domestic industry is imperfectly competitive, for then trade liberalization serves as a surrogate anti-trust policy, with competitively-supplied imports imposing a price ceiling on the domestic industry.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by eSocialSciences in its series Working Papers with number id:1536.

in new window

Date of creation: Jun 2008
Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:1536
Note: Institutional Papers
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:1536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Padma Prakash)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.