IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id11219.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Brain Drain Versus Brain Gain: The Study of Remittances in Southeast Asia and Promoting Knowledge Exchange Through Diasporas

Author

Listed:
  • Asia Development Bank

Abstract

The study attempts to identify the macroeconomic determinants of remittance inflows in South Asian countries. It uses additively separable utility function as theoretical framework and the Arellano-Bover/Blundell-Bond Systems of Generalized Method of Moments (SGMM) method as empirical framework. We use data on five countries in South Asia over the period 1976-2012. Results indicate that the remittance inflows in South Asia are altruistically motivated by the economic condition of home country whereas they are motivated by self-interest in case of the host country’s economic condition. The emigrant stocks abroad, financial development and political rights significantly and positively affect the remittance inflows. The impact of 9/11, 2001 on remittance inflows is also found significantly positive. This is probably as a result of receiving more remittances through formal channel instead of informal channel due to strict monetary regulation. The study implies that well managed financial, political and macroeconomic environment and pro- growth policy formulation are crucial to attract more remittances in this region.

Suggested Citation

  • Asia Development Bank, 2016. "Brain Drain Versus Brain Gain: The Study of Remittances in Southeast Asia and Promoting Knowledge Exchange Through Diasporas," Working Papers id:11219, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:11219
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Articles/show_Article.aspx?acat=InstitutionalPapers&aid=11219
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:11219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.