IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ese/cempwp/cempa9-26.html

A Review of Economic Insecurity

Author

Listed:
  • Richiardi, Matteo
  • Burdett, Ashley
  • He, Zhechun
  • Kolndrekaj, Aleksandra

Abstract

Economic insecurity has become an increasingly prominent topic in economic research, but there remains little agreement on how it should be defined and quantified. This review seeks to consolidate existing research and clarify the current state of knowledge, focussing on individual-based measures of economic insecurity, their determinants, and their effects. Our assessment is that thefield has evolved from single-source indicators to sophisticated, multi-dimensionalmodels, yet a unifying framework remains elusive. This stems from a persistent conceptual trade-off between axiomatic rigour, operational implementation, andthe challenge of integrating the dynamic nature of risk with data availability.Rather than seeking a single †best†indicator, this review categorizes specificmetrics according to distinct research objectives. By clarifying the trade-offs inherent in different measurement strategies, the paper provides a roadmap forfuture research to align empirical tools more effectively with the specific nature of the insecurity under study.

Suggested Citation

  • Richiardi, Matteo & Burdett, Ashley & He, Zhechun & Kolndrekaj, Aleksandra, 2026. "A Review of Economic Insecurity," Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series CEMPA9/26, Centre for Microsimulation and Policy Analysis at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:ese:cempwp:cempa9-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/files/working-papers/cempa/cempa9-26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ese:cempwp:cempa9-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jonathan Nears (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rcessuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.