IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/reconx/p0102.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Democratic Boundaries in the US and Europe. Inequality, Localisation and Voluntarism in Social Welfare Provsion

Author

Listed:
  • Tess Altman
  • David G. Mayes

Abstract

Our aim in this paper is to explore three related trends which have emerged in recent years that are contributing to important changes in the way both social welfare and democratic decision making over its form and content interact. These trends are: growing inequality, an increasing devolution of powers to local authorities and institutions, and a rise in voluntary provision and contributions. These trends have important consequences for social welfare, which is essentially redistributive. On the one hand, increasing localisation can permit a much better focus on the needs of local communities and improve incentives and efficiency, while on the other it can facilitate increasing polarisation. The match between decision making and democratic control can alter either positively or negatively, depending on the context. The rise of voluntarism may be a reinforcing or offsetting factor. These trends appear strongly in North America. This paper explores them using the examples of Workfare, Business Improvement Districts and Education. In particular we consider the consequences of increasing inequality, localisation, and voluntarism for European countries and the evolution of democratic relationships in the European Union.

Suggested Citation

  • Tess Altman & David G. Mayes, 2011. "Democratic Boundaries in the US and Europe. Inequality, Localisation and Voluntarism in Social Welfare Provsion," RECON Online Working Papers Series 18, RECON.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.reconproject.eu/main.php/RECON_wp_1118.pdf?fileitem=5456480
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    democracy; educational policy; European social model; governance; social policy; welfare state;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:reconx:p0102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marit Eldholm). General contact details of provider: http://www.reconproject.eu .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.