IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The New Regulation on Access to Documents: A Critical Analysis

Listed author(s):
  • Steve Peers
Registered author(s):

    The E.U.'s access to documents rules only came into existence following the public rejection of a new Treaty. Similarly, the rules have only been improved since under constant pressure from applicants via complaints to the Ombudsman and court cases. Fortunately, the Commission's proposals to weaken many important aspects of the access rules were rejected and the new Regulation ultimately contains several steps forward, counterbalanced by several steps backward and a number of disappointments. It will now fall to applicants again to press for an interpretation of the new Regulation that fully respects its purpose to ensure the "widest possible access" to documents. But it is unfortunate that the drafters of new Regulation did not take this principle seriously enough, and consequently missed opportunity adopt a clearer more comprehensive would have confirmed built upon previous status quo in every respect.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:,5277,en.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Queens University Belfast in its series Queen's Papers on Europeanisation with number p0028.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 30 Oct 2002
    Handle: RePEc:erp:queens:p0028
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:queens:p0028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Andrew EVANS)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.