Europeanization of the Regulation of GM Products: Science versus Citizens?
Using a case study, this paper explores elements of the notion of legitimacy in lawand policy making within the EU’s regulatory regime. The paper focuses on the roleof law, in particular judicial review litigation, as a legitimacy mechanism of lastresort. Diffusion of the locus of policy making within a system such as the EU’s mayraise problems for ‘classical’ conceptions of mechanisms for promoting legitimacy inlaw and policy making. The paper concentrates on the drawbacks of such conceptionswith respect to just one such mechanism: judicial review. To the extent that, in itsprovision for judicial review, the EU legal order has failed to take into account thenature of ‘new’ mechanisms of governance, such as comitology, the‘Europeanization’ of a particular policy field may mean decreased legitimacy inpolicy-making.
|Date of creation:||15 Mar 2002|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofPoliticsInternationalStudiesandPhilosophy/Research/PaperSeries/EuropeanisationPapers/ |
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:queens:p0025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Andrew EVANS)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Andrew EVANS to update the entry or send us the correct address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.