IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Das Recht im Prozess der Konstitutionalisierung Europas


  • Christian Joerges


This essay is a renewed effort to overcome the schisms between lawyers and political scientists in their conceptualisations of the European integration project. The first effort was my contribution Das Recht im Prozeá der Europischen Integration to Markus Jachtenfuchs/Beate Kohler-Koch (eds.), Europische Integration, Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 1996, 73-108. Its core message to the political scientists was that they should take the law (more) seriously. The key point of the present contribution is that they should understand the law as a moving target: Europe has been repeatedly juridified anew and differently. The law itself is exposed to debates and conflicts - and it is subject to change. It has to learn continuously. It goes through metamorphoses which affect its function in the building up of the European polity. This message is substantiated by analyses of three stages of the integration process. The first stage, covering the period from the establishment of the EEC up to the Single European Act, involves the building up of a supranational legal system which claimed primacy over national law, and, on this very ground, possessed constitutional significance which was, however, basically confined to an economic constitution. The second period covers the programme of the Delors Commission's White Paper on Completion of the Internal Market of 1985, which was rooted in the Single European Act of 1987, and was taken further by the Maastricht Treaty signed in 1991. Maastricht was a turning point in the constitutionalisation of Europe. The key question in practical politics for this stage was: can completion of the European internal market be only be achieved at the price of breaking down the various regulatory patterns that both continental and British welfarism had institutionalised? In legal terms: what limits do national constitutions set to the hollowing out of statehood through integration? What standards as to the rule of law and democracy does the institutionalisation of Europe have to meet? The third section addresses the present situation in which Europe is engaging in three projects at once: The writing down of a constitutional convention, the experimenting with new modes of governance - and enlargement. The first of these is the domain of the integration through law paradigm. In the second, a turn to economic rationality was launched. At present, the debate on governance is attracting enormous attention whereas constitution building has become a matter of high politics. At the same time, the law pursues its less visible and less spectacular path of constitutionalisation from below further. That incremental striving for a law-mediated legitimacy of European governance remains, so the essay concludes, an option that ought not to be given up lightly

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Joerges, 2002. "Das Recht im Prozess der Konstitutionalisierung Europas," MZES Working Papers 52, MZES.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:mzesxx:p0027

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Wendt, Alexander, 1992. "Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(02), pages 391-425, March.
    2. repec:cup:apsrev:v:74:y:1980:i:02:p:432-446_16 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. P. D., 1988. "Introduction," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., vol. 10(4), pages 527-527, July.
    4. Helen Wallace, 2000. "Possible Futures for the European Union: A British Reaction," Jean Monnet Working Papers 7, Jean Monnet Chair.
    5. Moe, Terry M, 1990. "Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story," Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(0), pages 213-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    constitutional change; enlargement; integration theory; law; legitimacy; multilevel governance; polity building; supranationalism;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:mzesxx:p0027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Melbeck). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.