IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/jeanmo/p0199.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

EU Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base: Guided Variety versus Strict Uniformity - Lessons from the U. S. States’ Tax Chaos

Author

Listed:
  • Johanna Hey

Abstract

Taxation of business profits is not yet harmonized in the European Union. In its first part this article takes the position that the ongoing tax competition and the growing economic integration calls for a common system of the taxation of EU multinationals. At present the European Commission pursues a concept of a fully uniform Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB). In view of the slender chances that a directive without any leeway for national alterations will receive the necessary unanimous support of all 27 Member States the second part of this article discusses a less ambitious approach of guided variety by an analysis of the US States corporate income tax system which despite many common features is far from being uniform. In the third part economic and legal consequences of a less uniform CCCTB will be scrutinized.

Suggested Citation

  • Johanna Hey, 2008. "EU Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base: Guided Variety versus Strict Uniformity - Lessons from the U. S. States’ Tax Chaos," Jean Monnet Working Papers 2, Jean Monnet Chair.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:jeanmo:p0199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/08/080201.html
    File Function: Contents/abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/080201.pdf
    File Function: Part of text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Annelies Roggeman & Isabelle Verleyen & Philippe Van Cauwenberge & Carine Coppens, 2013. "The EU apportionment formula: insights from a business case," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 235-251, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    tax competition;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:jeanmo:p0199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Charlie Pike (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.