IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

A Remaining Share or a New Part? The Union’s Role vis-à-vis Minorities After the Enlargement Decade

Listed author(s):
  • Gabriel N Toggenburg
Registered author(s):

    This article attempts to identify the role of the Union vis-à-vis (its) minorities after enlargement. Does the Union simply continue to take care of the remaining share of the tasks it provided during the enlargement decade or does it play a new part? In the former case theUnion would merely continue to apply the conditionality-policy vis-à-vis current and futurecandidate states. In the latter case the Union would, firstly, revamp its conditionality policy inits external relations, secondly, considerably strengthen cooperation with the other two European players in the area of minority protection and, thirdly, develop stronger internal engagement for minorities living on the EU-territory. The author argues that scenarios of fading out have so far not materialized. Rather the Union’s policy vis-á-vis the Western Balkans shows a revamped engagement for minority interests in the Union’s external relations (part 2). Moreover a new inter-organisational trialogue between the EU, the OSCE and Council of Europe is on its way and will presumably further develop in future (part 5). Last but not least the article shows that even in the internal sphere the Union is strengthening its minority momentum. In this context the author not only examines the Constitution of Europe (part 3) but focuses on new modes of governance in the areas of the EuropeanEmployment Strategy, the Social Inclusion Process and the Immigration policy (part 4). The author notes that the internalization of the minority-issue goes hand in hand with a shift of interest from old minorities to new minorities. In conclusion he says that the enlarged Union is not only taking care of a remaining share of its former minority engagement but assuming a new part in the area of minority protection.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by European University Institute (EUI), Department of Law in its series EUI-LAW Working Papers with number 15.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 01 May 2006
    Handle: RePEc:erp:euilaw:p0050
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:euilaw:p0050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Machteld Nijsten)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.