IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Das öffentlichen Diensrecht aus der Perspektive der vergleichenden Verwaltungswissenschaft


  • Jacques Ziller


International comparisons of Civil Services usually overlook the difficulties due to differing definitions of the civil service in national legal systems. Comparative statistics are therefore extremely misleading, as they are at best based on formal-legal criteria instead of being based on functional definitions. Beyond the issue of numbers, comparing the legal regimes of civil services can also be misleading if the constitutional framework is ignored, as demonstrated by the link between the constitutional principles applying to the Royal prerogative in the UK,and if attention is centred on the source of regulation – as demonstrated by the case of the socalled privatisation of the Italian civil service. Furthermore, any comparison between civil service regimes should also take into account the content of the relevant regulations and compare them with the rules and principles applicable in the same country’s labour law.There is no such a thing as an international common core of civil service regulation

Suggested Citation

  • Jacques Ziller, 2006. "Das öffentlichen Diensrecht aus der Perspektive der vergleichenden Verwaltungswissenschaft," EUI-LAW Working Papers 9, European University Institute (EUI), Department of Law.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:euilaw:p0045

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Giandomenico Majone, 1993. "The European Community Between Social Policy and Social Regulation," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 153-170, June.
    2. Sauter, W., 2008. "Services of general economic interest and universal service in EU law," Discussion Paper 2008-017, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    public administration; France; Germany; Italy; U.K.; law; political science;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:euilaw:p0045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Machteld Nijsten). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.