Author
Abstract
Ever since the founding of the Austrian Bundesrat (Federal Council) of the Austrian Parliament, there have been discussions about its need to be reformed. The debate has mainly focused on the domestic competences of the second chamber of Parliament. The aim of this thesis is to investigate the EU-specific competences of the Austrian Bundesrat and the actual enforcement of these rights. It is examined to which extent the Bundesrat evolved to the “European chamber†of the Austrian Parliament between 2013 and 2016, as claimed by the Bundesrat in its activities reports. The thesis illustrates which policy areas are covered through these activities and investigates how cases where the EU Committee of the Bundesrat objected to legislative proposals based on the principle of subsidiarity are dealt with on a European level. The theoretical framework of this work is the concept of Historical Institutionalism by Kathrin Thelen and co-authors. In order to answer the research question, first the domestic and the EU-specific competences of the Austrian Bundesrat, which are based on the Treaty on European Union and the Austrian federal constitution, are illustrated. The analytical part of the study begins with a comparison of the activities of the EU Committees of the Nationalrat (National Council) with those of the EU Committee of the Bundesrat. Subsequently, the reasoned opinions of the EU Committee of the Bundesrat are reviewed and analysed. In a last step, two expert interviews were conducted to provide a more comprehensive context for the findings of the thesis. The research has shown that in the period of 2013-2016 the Bundesrat indeed evolved to the “European chamber†of the Austrian Parliament. However, this finding is not entirely clear. While three of the five chosen evaluation criteria indicated that the Bundesrat takes on more EU-specific tasks, two criteria pointed towards the Nationalrat. The Austrian Federal Council issued reasoned opinions on European legislative proposals covering six different policy areas. Most of the proposals objected by the EU Committee of the Bundesrat in the given time period have meanwhile entered into force. None of the proposals against which the EU Committee of the Bundesrat issued a reasoned opinion reached the required number of votes from the national parliaments to initiate a subsidiarity check. In only one out of eleven cases did the Austrian representative in the Council of Ministers vote against the European legislative proposal objected by the Bundesrat, but to no avail.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:eifxxx:p0040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gerda Falkner The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Gerda Falkner to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: http://eif.univie.ac.at .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.