IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erp/arenax/p0013.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Constitution’s Gift? A deliberative democratic analysis of constitution-making in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • John Erik Fossum & Agustín José Menéndez

Abstract

Our aim in this article is to consider whether the Union’s deliberation over and decision-making on constitutional norms, can contribute to render it more democratic. From a normative perspective, the way a constitution is forged has deep implications for its democratic legitimacy. In light of recent events, we consider how procedural changes in constitution-making might contribute to rectify the Union’s democratic deficit. To do so we first develop a thin model of constitution-making based on the central tenets of deliberative democracy. We seek to outline how a legitimate constitution-making process will look from a deliberative democratic perspective. Second, we distil out some of the core characteristics of the Intergovernmental Conference (hereafter, IGC) model and assess this against the normative model, to establish the democratic quality of the IGC model. Third, we assess the current Laeken process by means of spelling out the central tenets of this mode of constitution-making, and we assess it in relation to the normative standards of the deliberative model. In the fourth and final step, we consider what contribution constitution-making might make to the handling of the EU’s legitimacy deficit(s). This article has later been published in European Law Journal vol. 11, No.4, pp. 380-410

Suggested Citation

  • John Erik Fossum & Agustín José Menéndez, 2005. "The Constitution’s Gift? A deliberative democratic analysis of constitution-making in the European Union," ARENA Working Papers 13, ARENA.
  • Handle: RePEc:erp:arenax:p0013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/working-papers2005/papers/05_13.xml
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    deliberative democracy; constitution building; legitimacy; normative political theory;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erp:arenax:p0013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sindre Eikrem Hervig). General contact details of provider: http://www.arena.uio.no/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.