IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erg/wpaper/1747.html

Examining Undergraduate University Programs’ Appropriateness at Employability Outcomes in Jordan and Egypt Using Ordered Forests Method

Author

Listed:
  • Obbey A. Elamin

    (King Faisal University)

Abstract

This study examines university graduates’ ratings of the Bachelor of Science (BSc) program’s appropriateness regarding employability outcomes in the labor market. The study uses crosssectional data from two countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, Egypt and Jordan. The graduates’ rating is modelled using the ordered response method, where we apply the ordered forests machine learning technique, and compare its results with the conventional ordered probit model. The results show that differences in the education system and labor market opportunity structure influence graduates’ ratings of the appropriateness of the BSc program. Graduates’ skill matching in their jobs is found to be the strongest factor that impacts the ratings and the satisfaction about the university degree. Policies are required to enhance graduates’ employability. The marginal effects of the ordered probit model can be implied as significant, even when the size of the effect is trivial and has no real impact on the conditional probabilities, but can easily be linked to the relative importance ranks of the covariates in the model, in contrast to the ordered forests.

Suggested Citation

  • Obbey A. Elamin, 2024. "Examining Undergraduate University Programs’ Appropriateness at Employability Outcomes in Jordan and Egypt Using Ordered Forests Method," Working Papers 1747, Economic Research Forum, revised 20 Nov 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://erf.org.eg/publications/examining-undergraduate-university-programs-appropriateness-at-employability-outcomes-in-jordan-and-egypt-using-ordered-forests-method/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://url-shortener.me/9Z6
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Namees Nabeel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erfaceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.