IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erg/wpaper/1735.html

Does Monetary Policy Respond Differently to Oil Price Shocks? New Evidence from The Gulf Cooperation Council Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Al-Hashel

    (Qatar University)

  • Atef Alrashidi

    (Saudi Central Bank)

  • Youssef Saidi

    (Gulf Monetary Council)

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of oil supply and demand shocks in monetary policy stance among the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries using a panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) framework and annual panel data over the period 1980-2019. The impulse response functions show that under the symmetric definition of oil shocks (‘all’ shocks), the inflation shock leads to a contractionary monetary policy in GCC countries. Nevertheless, based on asymmetric supply-driven and demand-driven specifications, we find clear evidence of a differentiated reaction of monetary policy to asymmetric oil-induced inflation shocks. Following an oil demand-induced inflation shock, the monetary policy stance remains neutral or becomes accommodative (Dovish). On the other side, the real interest rate in GCC countries increases in response to the anticipated oil supply-induced inflation shock, suggesting that monetary policy stance may become contractionary (Hawkish). With regard to policy implications, as previously experienced, the monetary policy stance in GCC countries must be sensitive to the source of the oil-induced inflation shocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Al-Hashel & Atef Alrashidi & Youssef Saidi, 2024. "Does Monetary Policy Respond Differently to Oil Price Shocks? New Evidence from The Gulf Cooperation Council Countries," Working Papers 1735, Economic Research Forum, revised 20 Sep 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://erf.org.eg/publications/does-monetary-policy-respond-differently-to-oil-price-shocks-new-evidence-from-the-gulf-cooperation-council-countries/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bit.ly/4oWwWc3
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Namees Nabeel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erfaceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.