IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erg/wpaper/1723.html

The Incidence and Wage Penalty of Overqualification: The Case of Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Fakih

    (Lebanese American University)

  • Zeina Lizzaik

    (Concordia University)

Abstract

The phenomenon of overqualification is becoming increasingly common across many countries. This research study examines the factors that determine overqualification, the impact of overqualification on wages, and the earning differences between genders in the case of Egypt. We use a cross-sectional micro-level dataset taken from the Egyptian Labor Force Survey (LFS) conducted by the Economic Research Forum (ERF). After employing a Probit model to capture the factors determining overqualification, our empirical results reveal that different sociodemographic features as well as economic sector- and job-related factors determine overqualification. Moreover, we apply different matching techniques, radius matching, nearestneighbor matching, a weighting method, and inverse probability weighting (IPW) to estimate the causal impact of overqualification on wage earnings. The result shows that overqualification negatively affects hourly wage earnings. For further investigation, we estimate our regression by gender. The coefficients are negative for both genders, with a higher magnitude among females, revealing that overqualified females face higher wage penalties than overqualified males. The paper provides policy recommendations for both the Egyptian educational system and the job market to mitigate overqualification in the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Fakih & Zeina Lizzaik, 2024. "The Incidence and Wage Penalty of Overqualification: The Case of Egypt," Working Papers 1723, Economic Research Forum, revised 20 Aug 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://erf.org.eg/publications/the-incidence-and-wage-penalty-of-overqualification-the-case-of-egypt/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bit.ly/3AWhaJU
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Namees Nabeel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erfaceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.