IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/erg/wpaper/1722.html

Does The Trillion-Dollar Cost of Sanctions Matter for Iranian Economic Development?

Author

Listed:
  • Reza Zamani

    (Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran)

Abstract

This paper estimates the economic cost of sanctions on Iran (both aggregate and per capita) and their effect on economic development. Using a synthetic control method (SCM), we find that sanctions cost approximately $1.2 trillion for the period 2011-2022, which is even more than the cost of the Iran-Iraq war (1981-1988) for Iran. Sanctions cost around $150, $450, and $600 billion for the agriculture, industry, and services sectors, respectively. On average, Iran has lost around 23 percent of its economic capacity due to sanctions. Moreover, the cost of sanctions during the Obama, Trump, and Biden presidencies is about $500, $450, and $250 billion, respectively, while the annual GDP per capita loss during the Obama, Trump, and Biden presidencies is, on average, $1,050, $1,316, and $1,428, respectively. Sanctions have changed the production structure in Iran, making Iranian economic development move backwards and resulting in lost years (2011-2022). Defining three alternative scenarios and comparing them with the SCM results, confirm our findings. Finally, by studying the average growth rate of both GDP and GDP per capita for Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkiye, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), we find that sanctions are the dominant factor for Iran’s accelerating economic divergence from the other three countries

Suggested Citation

  • Reza Zamani, 2024. "Does The Trillion-Dollar Cost of Sanctions Matter for Iranian Economic Development?," Working Papers 1722, Economic Research Forum, revised 20 Aug 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://erf.org.eg/publications/does-the-trillion-dollar-cost-of-sanctions-matter-for-iranian-economic-development/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://bit.ly/4cOJfQI
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:erg:wpaper:1722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Namees Nabeel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erfaceg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.