Post-Conflict Reconstruction, Stabilization and Growth Agenda for Sudan

Sudan is currently embroiled in high-intensity, catastrophic, and factional military warfare, which is a culmination of an acrimonious transition following a popular uprising that managed to depose the long-reigning kleptocratic regime of General Omer al-Bashir in December 2018. However, as grave as it may be, the heavy legacy of this regime was not only confined to a divided military. Under the watch of this regime, the country experienced a major economic decline following the independence of South Sudan in 2011, due to the loss of more than three-quarters of its oil revenue. The economy tumbled by almost 50 percent to become an archetype of what’s known in the macroeconomic literature as the “sudden stops.†In this paper, we argue that the same entrenched economic interests that explain the failure of the former regime to prepare for the massive economic and political shock waves associated with the partitioning of the country are also relevant in explaining why the military leadership reneged on their commitment to the constitutional transition to civilian democratic rule – even at the risk of squandering the economic gains and the popular political legitimacy associated with the revolution. In view of the current warfare, we argue that the post-conflict financing and policy package should target three main priorities: urgent post-conflict reconstruction support; moving fiscal policy and structural reforms from austerity to growth; and visible progress on an urgent timeline to create political support. Moreover, we use a long-term growth model to show that the economic cost for Sudan would be catastrophic should the current military warfare be left to spiral into a long-term ethnic civil war. Instead, we show that if peace is quickly restored and robust economic reforms are implemented, the country will achieve peaceful “renaissance†growth transitions, exploiting its huge agricultural potential.