IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/35406.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why the Ukraine crisis should push the UK and EU into a tighter embrace on security policy

Author

Listed:
  • Blockmans, Steven

Abstract

One of the costs of Brexit is the weakened ability of both the UK and the EU to shape a strong joint response to Russia�s threats to pan-European security. In the standoff over Ukraine, the need for close cross-Channel cooperation is particularly acute for any effective sanctions package negotiated with the US. Yet, post-Brexit relations between the UK and the EU are currently governed by a narrow Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) which does not include a designated chapter on political dialogue and that, barring a handful of exceptions, does not contain any provisions on cooperation on foreign and security matters. Fortunately, the preparatory work undertaken to reach the bilateral accord contains the answer to the question on how trust between the parties can be regained through procedural means. This policy brief highlights the embers of the Brexit bonfire that might be raked up to rekindle the flame of dialogue and cooperation between the UK and the EU in foreign affairs and security policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Blockmans, Steven, 2022. "Why the Ukraine crisis should push the UK and EU into a tighter embrace on security policy," CEPS Papers 35406, Centre for European Policy Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:35406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdn.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/CEPS-PB2022-03_Why-the-Ukraine-crisis-should-push-the-UK-and-EU-into-a-tighter-embrace-on-security-policy.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:35406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margarita Minkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepssbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.