IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/34788.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to refine the contributions to the Single Resolution Fund? Proposal for an alternative methodology

Author

Listed:
  • De Groen, Willem Pieter
  • Oliinyk, Inna

Abstract

The Single Resolution Fund (SRF) needs to provide the necessary funding for resolutions, avoiding the need to bail out banks with taxpayers’ money. The SRF relies on the banks that are part of the Banking Union to collect the funds. However, the current methodology used to determine the SRF contributions is difficult to replicate, overly complex and not fully coherent with the remainder of the resolution framework and capital requirements. This study proposes an alternative methodology that could potentially address the challenges with the current SRF contribution methodology. The alternative methodology reduces and simplifies the number of indicators used, as well as the number of contributors. Additionally, the proposed alternative methodology significantly reduces the number of risk-adjusted contributors and is more aligned with other bank requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • De Groen, Willem Pieter & Oliinyk, Inna, 2021. "How to refine the contributions to the Single Resolution Fund? Proposal for an alternative methodology," CEPS Papers 34788, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:34788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Refine-contributions-to-the-SRF.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Schoenmaker & Bruegel, 2016. "The impact of the legal and operational structures of euro-area banks on their resolvability," Policy Contributions 17984, Bruegel.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Alejandro Fernández Fernández, 2020. "Considerations of the SPE and MPE resolution," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 278-287, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:34788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margarita Minkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepssbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.