IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/epa/cepawp/2011-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wall Street's Stake in Pension Reform

Author

Abstract

As this report was being prepared in the summer of 2011, America's institutional investors continued to face significant regulatory uncertainties as policy makers – including the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform and Vice President Biden's Middle Class Task Force – struggled with the fact that a rapidly increasing number of Americans face retirement age with inadequate pensions. The asset management industry is divided among financial firms using a broad range of different business models, meaning that pension reform proposals will impact firms differently based on the shift in the type of retirement accounts and the level of the flow of funds into them. For example, a mandatory supplement to Social Security – the SCEPA/Economic Policy Institute (EPI) Guaranteed Retirement Account plan – will mainly benefit managers who now manage pooled retirement assets and charge wholesale or group-based fees. The New America Foundation Universal 401(k) plan and the Urban Institute's Super Simple Saving Plan on the other hand will direct more assets to 401(k) plans and IRA providers who manage self-directed worker plans on a retail basis. In this regard, the New Benefit Platform proposed by the ERISA Industry Committee (ERIC) would also promote individual-directed plans. This study is the first to examine exactly how major pension proposals will affect Wall Street firms. With retirement assets making up 21% of assets under management, the nation's financial industry would be greatly affected by any change in the system and the leading reform proposals for the U.S. employer-based pension system, analyzed here, will change the configuration of retirement products and management arrangements.

Suggested Citation

  • David Stubbs & Teresa Ghilarducci, 2011. "Wall Street's Stake in Pension Reform," SCEPA working paper series. 2011-9, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
  • Handle: RePEc:epa:cepawp:2011-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.economicpolicyresearch.org/images/docs/research/retirement_security/Ghilarducci_Stubbs_2011-9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epa:cepawp:2011-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bridget Fisher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cenewus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.