IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/10561.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Detecting response styles by using dual scaling of successive categories

Author

Listed:
  • van de Velden, M.

Abstract

A response style denotes a certain mapping of latent preferences to a rating scale that is common among a certain group of individuals. For example, individuals from the same country may assign high ratings to the majority of objects regardless of the specific preferences for the objects. The existence of response styles causes problems in international and cross-cultural research as it makes it hard to compare findings. Moreover, even within homogeneous samples, response styles make it difficult to expose the underlying preference structure. Detecting the existence and influence of a response style is typically a difficult issue as the underlying preferences are not directly observable. Hence, we can never be sure if the observed ratings are the result of a response style or an adequate representation of the preferences. In this paper, we consider the use of dual scaling as a tool to detect the existence of a response style. By means of a simulation study, we assess the performance of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • van de Velden, M., 2007. "Detecting response styles by using dual scaling of successive categories," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2007-41, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:10561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/10561/EI2007_41.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pieter Schoonees & Michel Velden & Patrick Groenen, 2015. "Constrained Dual Scaling for Detecting Response Styles in Categorical Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 968-994, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:10561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.