IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Relative Minimax

Listed author(s):
  • Daniele Terlizzese

    (Bank of Italy and EIEF)

Registered author(s):

    To achieve robustness, a decision criterion that recently has been widely adopted is Wald's minimax, after Gilboa and Schmeidler (1989) showed that (one generalisation of) it can be given an axiomatic foundation with a behavioural interpretation. Yet minimax has known drawbacks. A better alternative is Savage's minimax regret, recently axiomatized by Stoye (2006). A related alternative is relative minimax, known as competitive ratio in the computer science literature, which is appealingly unit free. This paper provides an axiomatisation with behavioural content for relative minimax.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance (EIEF) in its series EIEF Working Papers Series with number 0804.

    in new window

    Length: 46 pages
    Date of creation: 2008
    Date of revision: May 2008
    Handle: RePEc:eie:wpaper:0804
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Via Sallustiana, 62 - 00187 Roma

    Phone: +39 066790013
    Fax: +39 0647924872
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eie:wpaper:0804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Facundo Piguillem)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.