IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

An Institutional Assessment of the Integrated Protected Area Fund (IPAF) in the Philippines

Listed author(s):
  • Alexander D. Anda Jr


    (Resources, Environment and Economics Center for Studies, Inc. (REECS))

The National Integrated Protected Areas System (NIPAS) Act of 1992 was enacted in response to an urgent need to protect the rich biological diversity of the Philippine ecosystems, which is seriously threatened by human exploitation. One of the critical elements of the law is the creation and administration of a trust fund, known as the Integrated Protected Areas Fund (IPAF) intended to finance the projects of the system. All incomes earned by the protected areas are deposited to the National Treasury as a trust fund, with 75% of the collection to be allocated to the protected areas that generated the revenue, and the balance, retained by the central IPAF to support non-revenue earning protected areas and the operation of the IPAF Governing Board. After NIPAS law's 12 years of implementation, this paper looked into the institutional and operational issues attendant to the establishment and operation of the IPAF, such as the multiple management structure, tedious bureaucratic procedures in accessing the fund, perceived increase in exploitative/development activities, and revenue sharing allocation will be explored and documented in details. To a certain extent, the study also explored how the presence of IPAF has affected the inflow of other funds into the protected areas and how come many protected areas are not generating its own revenue or not obtaining financial support from the central IPAF as intended. The study has established that 12 years after the NIPAS law, only 12 of the 68 protected areas that earned IPAF revenues have managed to secure the release of its IPAF fund and not one of the 140 non-earning protected areas has obtained financial support from the central IPAF.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: First version, 2006
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA) in its series EEPSEA Special and Technical Paper with number tp200609t1.

in new window

Date of creation: Sep 2006
Date of revision: Sep 2006
Handle: RePEc:eep:tpaper:tp200609t1
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eep:tpaper:tp200609t1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Arief Anshory yusuf)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.