IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eep/pbrief/pb2001101.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pesticides and Policy: The Impact of Integrated Pest Management on the Indonesian Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Budi P. Resosudarmo

    (Graduate Program in Economics - Faculty of Economics)

Abstract

Throughout Asia, hazardous chemicals, mainly farm pesticides, are stockpiled in warehouses and factories, posing major safety and health hazards to residents. The problem has become so serious that it has been labeled a "toxic time bomb" by the Food and Agriculture Organization. One of the most important measures to reduce the use of pesticides is integrated pest management (IPM), a package of practices that includes the use of manual labour, natural predators and careful timing of smaller doses. A key element of the program, and one of its biggest costs, is training of farmers in its use. Indonesia has been one the leaders in the use of IPM. Since 1989, a national IPM program has helped farmers in Indonesia reduce their dependence on pesticides and increase their harvests. It has also dramatically reduced the incidence of pesticide-related illnesses and environmental pollution. However, in 1999 the World Bank loan that was financing the program was terminated and the scheme was all but cancelled. Now, a new piece of research has shown that, rather than abandon the program, it makes economic sense for the Indonesian government to self-finance the scheme and increase the national IPM budget. The study found that the IPM program is not only beneficial to farmers and the environment but that it also stimulates and benefits the overall Indonesian economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Budi P. Resosudarmo, 2001. "Pesticides and Policy: The Impact of Integrated Pest Management on the Indonesian Economy," EEPSEA Policy Brief pb2001101, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Oct 2001.
  • Handle: RePEc:eep:pbrief:pb2001101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eepsea.org/pub/pb/pb2001101.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2001
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hugh Waddington & Birte Snilstveit & Jorge Hombrados & Martina Vojtkova & Daniel Phillips & Philip Davies & Howard White, 2014. "Farmer Field Schools for Improving Farming Practices and Farmer Outcomes: A Systematic Review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(1), pages -335.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eep:pbrief:pb2001101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Arief Anshory yusuf (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eepsesg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.