Stability of environmental values in the event of natural disasters: the case of biosecurity and a catastrophic flooding in Southeast Queensland
This paper presents the results of the first natural experiment in the stated preference literature that tests for the stability of environmental values in the event of a catastrophic natural disaster. Two subsequent choice experiment surveys were conducted in Southeast Queensland, a region of the state of Queensland in Australia. The objective of the choice experiment study was to estimate households’ willingness to pay for environmental biosecurity measures. The time interval between the two surveys was about six weeks. The second survey was launched two weeks after one of the worst flood events recorded in the state’s history. The results of the experiment can be summarized into three key points. First, no statistically significant differences were observed in the proportions of choices made by respondents during the first and second survey in 16 out of 20 choice questions. Second, the dummy variable representing the order of the survey was not statistically different than zero in the scale-parameter adjusted pooled regression model. Finally, no statistically significant difference was observed between the mean implicit prices of the three environmental attributes included in the choice questions. We conclude that household preferences for biosecurity in Southeast Queensland are disasterproof.
|Date of creation:||Jun 2011|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Crawford Building, Lennox Crossing, Building #132, Canberra ACT 2601|
Phone: +61 2 6125 4705
Fax: +61 2 6125 5448
Web page: https://crawford.anu.edu.au/research_units/eerh/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:een:eenhrr:10106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CAP Web Team)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.