IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Stability of environmental values in the event of natural disasters: the case of biosecurity and a catastrophic flooding in Southeast Queensland

Listed author(s):
  • Sonia Akter


    (Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University)

  • Tom Kompas


    (Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University)

  • Michael Ward


This paper presents the results of the first natural experiment in the stated preference literature that tests for the stability of environmental values in the event of a catastrophic natural disaster. Two subsequent choice experiment surveys were conducted in Southeast Queensland, a region of the state of Queensland in Australia. The objective of the choice experiment study was to estimate households’ willingness to pay for environmental biosecurity measures. The time interval between the two surveys was about six weeks. The second survey was launched two weeks after one of the worst flood events recorded in the state’s history. The results of the experiment can be summarized into three key points. First, no statistically significant differences were observed in the proportions of choices made by respondents during the first and second survey in 16 out of 20 choice questions. Second, the dummy variable representing the order of the survey was not statistically different than zero in the scale-parameter adjusted pooled regression model. Finally, no statistically significant difference was observed between the mean implicit prices of the three environmental attributes included in the choice questions. We conclude that household preferences for biosecurity in Southeast Queensland are disasterproof.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University in its series Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports with number 10106.

in new window

Date of creation: Jun 2011
Handle: RePEc:een:eenhrr:10106
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Crawford Building, Lennox Crossing, Building #132, Canberra ACT 2601

Phone: +61 2 6125 4705
Fax: +61 2 6125 5448
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:een:eenhrr:10106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CAP Web Team)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.