IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/een/crwfrp/1301.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamics of Public Sector Reforms in Bhutan: Interaction of Values within a Hybrid Administration

Author

Listed:
  • Lhawang Ugyel

Abstract

In recent decades public sector reforms have spread globally with tenacity and increasing pace. In particular, elements of new public management-related reforms have been attempted by almost most countries through various policy transfer mechanisms. Amidst such a spread of public sector reforms, there has been a mix of success and failure in their implementation. Part of the reason for such a mixture of results is because of the variations in the context and the culture of the public administrative systems. I use Bhutan, a relatively understudied Himalayan Kingdom, as an example to examine the dynamics of the interaction between a set of reforms embedded with certain values and its implementation within a hybrid administrative setting. In 2006 the Bhutanese government implemented the Position Classification System in Bhutan, which represents a major tranche of public sector reforms that includes components of performance management, recruitment and promotion reforms. And the public administration system in Bhutan, because of its political and socio-economic development history, has characteristics of the various paradigms and models of public administration. This paper aims to provide a better understanding on how hybrid systems of administration and management develop in situ through explaining the values of a nation. In doing so, I provide support to the argument that when implementing public sector reforms, it is important to consider the administrative tradition and the context within which the reforms are applied in, and the values and culture that are often attached with the reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Lhawang Ugyel, 2013. "Dynamics of Public Sector Reforms in Bhutan: Interaction of Values within a Hybrid Administration," Crawford School Research Papers 1301, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
  • Handle: RePEc:een:crwfrp:1301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2196225
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lhawang Ugyel, 2016. "Convergences and divergences of public sector reform in Bhutan: dynamics of incremental and transformational policies," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 118-130, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:een:crwfrp:1301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: David Stern (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asanuau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.