IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Método de selección y resultados académicos: Escuela de Ingeniería, Universidad de Chile

  • Ronald Fischer

    ()

  • Andrea Repetto

    ()

Estudiamos la capacidad predictiva del rendimiento académico de las distintas componentes del sistema de selección a las universidades para los alumnos de la Escuela de Ingeniería de la Universidad de Chile. Nuestros resultados indican que las notas de educación media y las pruebas específicas de física y matemáticas tienen una capacidad predictiva importante y estable, y que el efecto de las pruebas específicas es casi el doble del efecto de las notas. La prueba de aptitud matemática no tiene poder predictivo en forma individual, lo que potencialmente se puede explicar por el rango restringido de puntajes entre quienes ingresan a la Facultad. El poder predictivo del rendimiento en la Escuela de Ingeniería de las actuales componentes del sistema de selección sobrepasa el 40 % para la mayoría de las medidas de rendimiento utilizadas, luego de corregir por restricción de rango.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.dii.uchile.cl/~cea/sitedev/cea/www/download.php?file=documentos_trabajo/ASOCFILE120030326131546.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile in its series Documentos de Trabajo with number 144.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: 2002
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:edj:ceauch:144
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.dii.uchile.cl/cea/

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edj:ceauch:144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.