IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecr/col038/35914.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Manual metodológico de evaluación multicriterio para programas y proyectos

Author

Listed:
  • Pacheco, Juan Francisco
  • Contreras, Eduardo

Abstract

Este documento contiene tópicos relacionados con la inversión pública y opciones metodológicas para la evaluación y jerarquización de proyectos y programas, revela además temáticas de las organizaciones públicas relacionadas con los Sistemas Nacionales de Inversión Pública (SNIP), y pretende aportar en el sentido de incorporar, en la evaluación y priorización de programas y proyectos, métodos basados en criterios de evaluación relacionados con múltiples objetivos en una métrica común.

Suggested Citation

  • Pacheco, Juan Francisco & Contreras, Eduardo, 2008. "Manual metodológico de evaluación multicriterio para programas y proyectos," Manuales 35914, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col038:35914
    Note: Incluye bibliografía.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/35914
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lizbeth Martínez Ramírez & Jaime Munoz Flores & Arturo Torres Vargas, 2016. "The Analytical Hierarchy Process: An Optimal Methodology for Research in Entrepreneurship (Metoda Analytical Hierarchy Process – optymalna metodologia badan przedsiebiorczosci)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 14(62), pages 172-186.
    2. Genowefa Blundo-Canto & Gonzalo Rodríguez-Borray & Ángela-Rocío Vásquez-Urriago & María-Margarita Ramírez-Gómez & Gregorio Zambrano-Moreno & Leidy Tibaduiza-Castañeda & Bellanid Huertas-Carranza & Adr, 2023. "Impact Weaving: An Approach to Strengthening the Plausibility of Anticipated AR4D Impact Pathways," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(2), pages 402-425, April.
    3. Daniel Camilo Roman Quintero & Jose David Ortiz Contreras & Mauricio Alberto Tapias Camacho & Edgar Ricardo Oviedo-Ocaña, 2024. "Empirical Estimation of Landslide Runout Distance Using Geometrical Approximations in the Colombian North–East Andean Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Jairo Núnez & Felipe Castro & Nidia Rincón, 2014. "Evaluación institucional y de procesos con énfasis en el ciclo de proyectos del Sistema General de Regalías," Informes de Investigación 12655, Fedesarrollo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col038:35914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.