IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Increasing Competition and the Winner's Curse: Evidence from Procurement

Listed author(s):
  • Han Hong

    (Princeton University)

Registered author(s):

We empirically measure the effects increasing competition on equilibrium bidding in procurement auctions. In common value auctions, the winner's curse counsels more conservative bidding as the number of competitors increases. First, we estimate the structural parameters of an equilibrium bidding model and test for the importance of common value components in bidders' preferences. Second, we use these estimates to measure the effects on increasing competition on both individual bids as well as winning bids (ie. procurement costs). Methodologically, we have estimated a model which allows bidders' latent valuations for a contract to have both common and private value components. We analyze bid data from construction procurement auctions run by the New Jersey department of transportation in the years 1989-1997. Our results show that different types of contracts differ significantly in the degree that private and/or common value components are important, and these have contrasting implications on the effects of increasing competition on equilibrium bids and expected government procurement outlays. Auctions for highway work contracts are very close to a pure common value auction, while both common value and private value are important in auctions of bridge repair contracts. Furthermore, our results indicate that the winner's curse is particularly strong in these highway contract auctions. Simulated bid functions show that for the median bidder, the percentage markup increases from 50% with 2 bidders to above 70% with 10 bidders. Furthermore, winning bid simulations indicate that the average procurement cost is strictly increasing in the number of bidders as competition intensifies: for example, the median costs rise about 30%, as the number of bidders is increases from 3 to 6. These results emphasize how asymmetric information can overturn the common economic wisdom that more competition is always desirable, and have potentially important policy implications.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: main text
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Econometric Society in its series Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers with number 1628.

in new window

Date of creation: 01 Aug 2000
Handle: RePEc:ecm:wc2000:1628
Contact details of provider: Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:wc2000:1628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.