Expected Value Models: A New Approach
Two approaches dominate the time series literature for modeling expected value models. The first one is based on observable variables and includes ARMA and GARCH models, while the second one is based on latent variables and includes state space and stochastic volatility (or SV) models. The first approach is appealing because it allows to compute conditional expectations (e.g., for forecasting purpose) and to use the Quasi Maximum Likelihood (QML) type of estimation. However, its main limitation is that it imposes some indirect restrictions that are not desirable. For instance a GARCH model, which captures volatility dynamics, imposes that some marginal moments are not bounded, which is a clear limitation of the model. In contrast, state-space models do not impose such restrictions and are more flexible. However, the state space models do not allow to compute conditional expectation given observable variables (rather than latent variables) and do not allow the use of QML techniques for inference purposes. The main contribution of this paper is to introduce a new approach that has the advantages of ARMA and state space models. The model we propose is a latent variable model where one can compute explicitly the conditional expectations of the variable of interest and, consequently, to use QML estimation. In other words, we bridge the gap between ARMA (or GARCH) and state space (SV) models. We apply our approach in two examples. In the first one, we deal with modeling volatility, i.e., we introduce a SV model and derive the first four conditional moments. This allows us to give a structural interpretation for the time varying effects of skewness and kurtosis recently highlighted by the literature. The second example deals with asset pricing models. More precisely, we start by assuming some Euler equations fulfilled by utility function of a representative agent, where the relevant consumption is not observable. We then derive the Euler equations based on the observable consumption. This allows us to reconsider the equity premium puzzle from a different perspective than the traditional approaches.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||11 Aug 2004|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Phone: 1 212 998 3820|
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/pastmeetings.asp
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.