IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecm/nawm04/466.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Team Size and Geographic Dispersion in Scientific Research:

Author

Listed:
  • James Adams
  • Grant Black

Abstract

Team size in scientific research and its geographic dispersion are important because research collaboration indicates the division of labor, and because collaboration is one channel of by which knowledge spills over. For both reasons, economic efficiency of the knowledge-creating industries is intertwined with team size. This paper examines cross sectional patterns and time trends in the size of scientific teams, in collaboration between scientific institutions, and in the internationalization of research over the period 1981-1999. The data consist of 2.4 million scientific papers, or team-piecework observations, that cover the 110 top universities in the United States during 1981-1999. The number of authors per paper is our measure of team size. We find that size of scientific teams increases by 50% over the sample period. An unusually large proportion of the increase takes place since 1990, when the Internet underwent rapid commercial expansion. More striking still is the evidence on geographic dispersion of teams. Three explanations likely account for the rising institutional collaboration and internationalization of science: a) an increasing range of complementary skills is required to do cutting-edge research; b) the costs of team coordination at a distance have decreased; and c) the expansion of research outside the U.S. has made international collaboration more attractive. Given the speed of the adjustment, though, we conclude that declining cost and expansion of research elsewhere are the most likely explanations for growth in institutional collaboration, including abroad.

Suggested Citation

  • James Adams & Grant Black, 2004. "Team Size and Geographic Dispersion in Scientific Research:," Econometric Society 2004 North American Winter Meetings 466, Econometric Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    teams; scientists;

    JEL classification:

    • J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
    • L3 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.